Philosophical Limits

The development of any science, including the science of law, must go through a moral and philosophical comprehension of the actual legal events, to which more than once in his writings, called prominent Russian jurist. At the same time we should talk not about philosophical terminology 'disguise' of well-known concepts and research findings, and a truly scientific knowledge of the law, when we study not only its structural organization or form of expression outside, but its place in the philosophical ideas and principles of law in general. Immanuel Kant, who gave a lot of work and analysis of the glorification of reason in its positive aspects and manifestations, while at the same time it (the mind) binds to human self-will, rooted in 'the free' use of power of the mind, heart of our existence. The philosopher believed that serious trouble in society arise from the abuse of his own mind, 'is considered simply as a tool to meet different inclinations. " Moreover, 'the first use of them (man) of his mind was to abuse them (even against the direction of nature)' and that 'the history of nature, therefore, begins with the good, it is God's work; history of freedom – from the evil, for it – it human. " The root cause of relativity, ie, subjectivity of human evaluation, including lawyers, is at large. Or rather not so much freedom, how to abuse it. Moral blindness and mental abuse of freedom leads to some distortion of the hierarchy of values – theoretical or practical construction of values relative to the level of absolute values. One of the reasons for such purposes is geterogonii duality of human nature, expressed in the contradiction between the will and mind. These and other problems of abuse of rights in "legal and philosophical boundaries Freedom in the consciousness of man "in his scientific and practical activities (legal services) are engaged in qualified attorneys Law Firm" Irbis "Volgograd region.