To evade these laws, the companies argue, among other excuses, continuing research to develop and improve those products in favour of humanity. A recent report by the Joint United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) of Panama, indicated that the fact commit itself more and more to protect intellectual property in the pharmaceutical industries in developed countries, reduced spaces for competencies resulting in results that medicines are purchased at high prices and is therefore recorded less accessibility for the poor population. This specialized agency of the United Nations stated that the entry into force of free trade agreements (FTA) as the Central America, would be in the higher health expenditures for developing countries Thus studies conducted in Nations that have already adopted these neoliberal agreements indicate that drugs for the treatment of HIV and other diseases be exaggeratedly expensive. UNAIDS puts as example that a treatment with amlodipine (generic) can cost US $90 000, but if you are using the medication order cost reaches the amazing figure of $ 7.2 million is added, that two years ago in Pretoria was a trial against the Government in which the accusers were 39 international pharmaceutical companies. These firms argued that a 1997 South African law, violated global trade rules intellectual property, to open avenues to parallel importation and local production of generic substitutes.
The law was blocked for years by judicial action until after outlays and penal discussions the parties reached agreements that benefited the people of Burma affected by this disease. On the other hand it is very interesting what says voltairenet.org, that there is no that forget that throughout the 20th century, the pharmaceutical industry was developed and organized with the objective of controlling healthcare systems around the world through the systematic replacement of non-patentable natural therapies by patentable synthetic substances and, therefore, profits. This industry did not evolve naturally. On the contrary, it was a decision taken by a handful of wealthy businessmen and unscrupulous who wanted to make an investment.