Army Zapatista

Counting citizen support becomes the power of the parties, not in its ideology. This way the citizen participation in the governments, and therefore in the parties, is reduced to the day of the elections in such a way that the true democracy falls to which no longer we can call to him thus. The opportunity does not occur him to the town to comprise of the policy, the parties are conformed by people who follow a same one it rules in such a way that the differences nor the plurality are not tolerated, which are the bases of all democracy. The differences are accepted, take shelter and an agreement looks for common, not it exclusion of the differences. The democracy in theory it is known him for being incluyente, but when it does not exist a true equality and tolerance to the diverse thing, the democracy becomes excluding since different minorities do not feel represented by the government whom it ignores to them. A very clear example can be the Army Zapatista de National Liberacin, who assure that the democratic government at all does not guard by his demands and needs, so that they in answer decided not to recognize the government who does not recognize them as well.

The problem of the little correspondence on the part of the party is of serious gravity. A town that does not perceive answer on the part of the political parties stops trusting, to support it. The majority of the Mexicans was satisfied with the elections of the 2000 when the elect president was Vicente Fox. The country in fact did not vote by Fox, voted by change, change that conforms passed their presidential term was not given to the Mexicans. Mexico lost the hope from which the change of political party went to be like the difference that the nation needed after 70 years continuity PRI member, the change was in a divided congress, and a paralyzed policy. Transparency In government would help proper functioning.

Globalisation Industrialization

The true success of the globalisation will be determined insofar as the same allows to enjoy to each person the basic goods food and house, education and use, peace and social progress, economic development and justice. Juan Pablo II Introduction says, that there is a world-wide market, a culture of global masses, but National States persist, and as they have been debilitated enough by the neoliberal policies, the globalisation can be seen as its integrity and for its foundation threatens even that is the culture. For all student of administrative science, and so that it that interests the repercussions to him that have derived from the Globalisation, its incidence in some economy, in the culture, cannot be unknown what the Globalisation has come carrying out. Of our interest to enter us in its reach there, which represents. Majorities, basic considerations Not can to ignore, what represents the Globalisation in the world-wide scene, as well as industrialization for the conquest of new markets, the positioning of all those products and services that guarantee gains and consolidation of the great companies, especially in the developed countries, in the great economic blocks, all this thanks to the weaknesses of the countries nondeveloped, especially those that have stayed and follow employees in import of technology, as the specific case that the one of Venezuela concerns, that in the present payment a serious price on the matter, a cost that significantly affects the Venezuelan. We know that one has commented, that the globalisation would consist basically of an extension of the market until constituting itself in space common to guide the production, the interchange, the distribution and the consumption of goods and services between the countries and inhabitants worldwide. The important thing is to evaluate how it affects the culture of each involved country, as they operate the cultural industries. It is important to emphasize in the analysis, that in the Latin American debate (published by the Andres Magazine Beautiful) east world-wide phenomenon has been analyzed worse two ways: they consider that it is in danger which we are (or rather what we go being and producing through the cultural industries), that is to say, ours cultural particularitity, before the globalisation of certain hegemonic other people’s cultural models.