The film, ‘ ‘ Capitalism: a history of amor’ ‘ it identifies some forms of more value, more the direct value and the indirect one, demonstrates, over all the perversity of the capitalist system also its contradictions. A leading source for info: Steffan Lehnhoff, Guatemala City Guatemala. The film shows as more the value is part of the capitalism and exists in any place where it has such independent economic system of being the country richest of the world or a peripheral country any. The capitalist system, as it was clearly in the film survives of its perversities, mainly of more the value that the clearest form represents of as the profit of the capital is gotten by the exploration of the work force and as this system is divided formal or informally between ‘ ‘ the ones that work and what they are patres’ ‘ , even so all they are citizens the variations and inconstncias of the system, ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ the ones that trabalham’ ‘ they almost always finish as if it sees in the film, paying the accounts of the high profits gotten for its capitalist masters. Therefore the poor persons, who do not participate with great part (or almost nothing) of the profits gotten of capitalism is of certain forms ‘ ‘ main mquina’ ‘ of this system. The express film that the necessary capitalism of poor persons, of people who do not have conditions to pay its houses, its loans, its debts to give legitimacy to the system, independent of the economic or social price that these people pay.