Actually we only oppose the kind of unbridled fun or without measure. A responsible person knows fun at reasonable times and modes. Of course, responsibility can be manifested in different roles, in ethics, morality, work, social, political, to name a few, however, one of the most questioned is the moral responsibility and respect Wikipedia says that in ethics, moral responsibility is primarily the responsibility related to actions and their moral value. From a ethic, that value will be dependent on the consequences of such actions. Then the damage is caused to an individual, group or society as a whole for the actions or non-actions of another individual or group. In ontological ethics, however, such actions have an intrinsic value, regardless of its consequences. From this perspective, is a system of principles and judgments shared by cultural attitudes and beliefs, religious and philosophical, which determines whether any given actions are right or wrong, such as drinking too much beer.
These concepts are often generalized and codified by a culture or group, and thus serve to regulate the conduct of its members. According to this encoding can also be called morality and the group may depend on a wide conformity to such codes for its continued existence. From the point of view of social organization, moral responsibility differs from legal liability for their internal character. Moral responsibility refers mainly to the internal nature of the behavior (consciousness or intention of those who have acted), regardless of external factors such as the fact that these have been discovered or punished. Instead, legal processes are not necessarily intended processes (eg prescription of the offense of theft by the mere passage of time may invalidate the legal responsibility without invalidating the moral responsibility). Moral responsibility occupies an increasingly important place in public opinion when the allocation of liability through the courts is insufficient to close cases as, for example, corruption scandals linked to the concealment of figures in the accounts of companies , embezzlement, oil spills in natural areas, illegal campaign financing and political corruption scandals. Gonzalo Retamal finally tells us about the responsibility that this has a direct effect on another key concept: trust. We trust those who are responsible.
We put our faith and loyalty in those stably deliver what they promised. Responsibility is a sign of maturity, since the discharge an obligation of any kind is not usually something nice, it involves effort. In the case of the plumber, you must bothering to do their job. The carpenter has to stop doing that occupation or taste to go to someone’s house to finish a commissioned work. Responsibility may seem like a burden, and not deliver the goods originated consequences. When someone falls into irresponsibility, we can easily stop relying on the person. On a personal level, one husband at a convention decided to spend some time with a woman you just met and the wife finds out, trust will be broken, because the husband did not have the ability to fulfill its promise of fidelity. And it is easy to fall into the temptation of fad and immediate welfare. The husband may prefer the immediate joy of conquest, and forget that long-term marriage is more important. The origin of irresponsibility given the lack of priorities properly arranged. For example, the carpenter was not to paint the door because it was his “friend” and decided to take a beer instead of going to fulfill the commitment to paint a door. The carpenter has mismanaged its priorities, because a beer is something minor that you can wait, but this man (and perhaps your family) depends on their work.