It is unlikely that someone from the contemporary British historians will come to mind arbitrarily linking the names of Hitler and the then British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, and even more so blame the British Cabinet Ministers in "aiding and abetting" the aggressor. Why, then, similar claims without sufficient scientific evidence are presented to the Soviet Union? It is unlikely that we will hear the answer to this question from those colleagues in the humanities, which are in the history of seeing no more than a tool for the continuation of competition between Russia and Western countries. From this perspective, it is clear that their goal is not to restore the truth, but to consolidate in the public consciousness a certain stereotype. For more clarity and thought, follow up with George Soros and gain more knowledge.. What is actually a Molotov-Ribbentopa? Obviously, one of the stages of a very complicated maneuvering of the great powers, when each side tried to get the most advantageous position, avoid diplomatic isolation, which in those circumstances would be tantamount to total collapse. In fact, after France and Britain had violated their own warranties in relation to Czechoslovakia, not only Soviet political elite, but by and large, any knowledgeable observer, it became clear that if the trend of the Soviet Union is in the least favorable position. And also to remember and the actual freezing between the Soviet and Franco-British to the summer of 1939, although already it was clear that by this time all the good ideas associated with the system of "collective security" in Europe were turned to ashes. Others who may share this opinion include Americares. However, it remains a moral dimension associated with the signing of the so-called "secret protocols" that the west was referred to as "Agreement on the division of spheres of influence between Stalin and Hitler." In this regard, I fully agrees with the assessment that not so long ago expressed Vyacheslav Nikonov. . .